At a school with this much prestige in the field of public health, it shocks me that the students here, at the graduate school level, still exhibit the same juvenile, insensitive behaviors that I experienced from my high school peers. I really shouldn't be surprised, considering that the perpetrators of some of the most flagrant displays of ignorance are scholars who pride themselves on their extensive education. Don't get me wrong-- I still have the utmost respect for the institution, its faculty, and the research-- however I'm greatly disappointed with the worldview of my classmates, and the way in which this glaring problem is being addressed (or rather,
not addressed) in the classroom. Not that I care what they really think on a personal level, but the long-term implications scare me-- I hope the Weltanschauung of these aspiring public health professionals evolves for the better before they graduate and become educators, practitioners, and researchers.
I feel disillusioned, and I don't like it.
Let's take the most recent example. In my research methods class, the topic of the lecture was different measurements used in behavioral sciences research. The professor was talking about nominal data, which are basically categorical data versus numeric data; for example, data from questions of race/ethnicity, marital status, and
gender. "Gender, for example," she said, "can be categorized in questionnaires as either Male or Female..."
She paused briefly.
"Or sometimes 'Other'."
An obvious wave of snickers ensued across the lecture hall. The professor moved on to the text topic.
First, why was there a such pervasive reaction to snicker after the professor suggested the use of "Other" in questions of gender demographics? What the hell is so funny? Is this how these people are going to mock the communities they serve when they are actually out in the field? Or are they just going to play the "unaware" and "unexposed" card forever to justify their ignorance? Because honestly, if these graduate-level students need to play that card at this stage in the game, then they need to learn a few things about the world before they decide to pursue something like
public health. What exactly did these students
do in undergrad anyway? Was their social experience really epitomized by their Spring Break debauchery in Cancun? I don't expect people to
agree with how others live their lives, but I do expect a higher level of "tolerance" (whatever the hell
that means) and maturity. Snickering about topics of sexuality in a classroom setting just seems really high school to me.
Then there's the question of why the professor didn't say anything after such an obvious and obnoxious reaction from the class? She must have thought that the consideration of an "Other" box was important enough to bring up, yet she did nothing to explain or clarify, even after it was evident that the class didn't
get it. Much of her research involves gay men, so I presume that this experience compounded with her impressive credentials makes her sufficiently-equipped to handle these issues. I will give her the benefit of the doubt and assume she was oblivious to the class reaction.
But the reaction really was quite conspicuous.
Regardless, her dismissal of the snickers didn't stop me from approaching her about it... in a very non-confrontational manner. I was very careful about that-- you have to walk on eggshells when talking to professors, you know. I focused on the class reaction versus her non-reaction, of course. She was receptive, albeit with a tinge of defensiveness. I'm not sure that anything came out of that brief dialogue, besides her awareness that I was uncomfortable with the class dynamic. Maybe her solution is simply not to bring up the "gender" issue in future classes. Gotta love avoidance.
Why not address the the use of the word "gender" in research, while I'm at it? I won't go into the politics of transgenderism here, as I am not yet an expert on the issue, but from a methodological standpoint, I
do know that the continued use of the word "gender" in demographic questionnaires is problematic. Why not use the word "sex" instead? That seems to be more fitting for the information these researchers are trying to obtain. "Gender" is a concept, a socially-constructed idea, not a fact, so unless researchers have a specific way of
thoughtfully and
thoroughly operationalizing the term "gender" beyond the context of sexual identity research, then it is wholly inappropriate, useless, and ultimately detrimental to use it. Gathering information on "gender" when they in fact mean "sex" can lead to great misrepresentation and false data, particularly when researchers are looking to make comparisons between the "biological" sexes.
Sexual minorities are severely understudied and, moreover,
inadequately studied in health research. The U.S. tends to approach public health within a disease-focused paradigm-- we look at a disease and then study affected or "at-risk" communities, rather than looking at the characteristics and culture of a population and
then examining
their health issues. As a result, most health statistics of sexual minorities become hidden within the data of heteronormative health research, and therefore our unique needs are never brought to light. This type of camouflaged exclusion can be paralleled to the earlier days of health research when, unless they were the topic of the study question (usually in a pathologized manner), ethnic minorities were absent from the research samples. Findings from White-only subject data were generalized to the entire population. This could have been because researchers either a) didn't consider or regard the possibility of unique health needs of non-White peoples or b) they didn't consider or regard ethnic minorities to be important enough to study. Regardless of the reasons, the field has come to realize this problem and in recent decades there has been a paradigm shift in the way health research recognizes and addresses issues of health disparities amongst people of diverse ethnic, cultural, and socio-economic backgrounds.
Though there has been progress in the research of and health care approaches for ethnic minorities and the White majority, sexual minorities continue to have no presence as a population in health research outside of the context of STD's or in examinations of "behaviors," particularly, "sexual behaviors." It's as though we-- and our health-- are continued to be defined by our "behaviors," in spite of the recognition that our sexuality encompasses much more than our sexual activities. Also, other "health risk behaviors" that are assessed in the limited research are from a deficit-based perspective. Where is the research on our attributes? Our behavioral and cognitive coping strategies in dealing with a world that is hostile towards us? Our behaviors that exhibit our strength when having to maneuver through spaces that force us to conceal who we are? Our complex and fine-tuned social instincts that we must constantly modify in order to survive in an environment that punishes us (often by violence and death) for loving people who society has deemed as unacceptable for us to love?
Research outside of this "risk-behavioral" framework is generally excluded from the most major public health publications, like the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR); for example, there has been a multitude of studies that has revealed that queer youth are at increased risk for attempting suicide, yet there was no mention of sexuality in an MMWR report on violence among high school students and teen suicide. The MMWR, of course, is a product of our federal government, which has a pattern of excluding research that does not resonate well with its agenda. Politically-driven research makes it impossible to know what truths are being discovered and hidden, or if what is being disseminated is actually the truth to begin with. I won't go into the manipulation of data and statistics here. There are
books on that.
Another disappointment is the fact that there is no student organization in place for LGBTQ students. I absolutely do
not get it. With the prevalence of queer individuals in the school and in Atlanta, there is no reason for this. I have no idea who or where the other gay students are, and it makes it challenging for me to socialize. It's not as though I can't socialize with straight people... I just can't socialize with straight people who make it difficult for me to be comfortable in their space. Their space, which is everywhere. I hate having to out myself to people, especially in situations wherein I'm in some awkward conversation about boyfriends and fiancees and why there's no point in dressing up for school because of the female majority in our classes blah blah blah gross. When I
do out myself, I often get the awkward, "Oh-ok-that's cool-heh-so-yeah-I-had-no-idea-because-you-don't
-look-like-a-lesbian
-and-now-I-feel-stupid-crap-now-I-have-no-idea-what-to-talk-to-you-about-
because-we-obviously-must-not-have-a-damn-thing-in-common-I-hope-you're
-not-checking-me-out-because-I'm-not-'like-that'-I'm-just-not-going-to-talk-to
-you-anymore-because-it's-too-hard-for-me-to-have-to-be-that-socially-aware-
I-prefer-my-safe-little-world-where-everyone-is-like-me-so-I-don't-have-to-
deal-with-my-inability-to-interact-with-people-who-are-different-I-can't-handle
-having-to-awkwardly-overcompensate-for-the-fact-that-I-am-a-little-weirded-out
-by-gay-people" look.
Which I'm used to, I guess.
Maybe part of the dynamic is my own projection of discomfort with the situation as well, because I'm all too familiar with this inevitable reaction by now. I think I've started to anticipate it, which likely just augments the pregnancy of the pause in such conversations as the one previously described. I do try my best to buffer the tension by being as matter-of-fact and conversational as possible... I mean, sheesh, I'm the same person you were talking to just a few minutes ago, before you discovered that I have "women friends." If I don't make it a big deal, then maybe they won't make it a big deal, right? At least on the surface.
I am perhaps being unfair to some of the people I've encountered here. While the aforementioned reaction is most common, there are some straight individuals who seem eager to have a token gay female friend. I don't like to be tokenized, but if my friendship can alter someone's ill-conceived notions of queer women (of color, I should add), then why should I complain? One woman in particular openly engaged in a Q & A about queer life, and while I made sure to acknowledge that my story and thoughts could not possibly represent those of all queer people, I was able to dispel
some of the misconceptions and assumptions with which she'd grown up in her fairly conservative culture. As the conversation progressed, she became much more direct and frank, which I appreciated. It's much easier to address direct questions than to decipher through layers of minced words.
So. After weeks and weeks of deliberation, the classroom incident described above provided the ultimate push for me to finally send out an email to the entire student body about my interest in forming a student organization for LGBTQ students. I guess there had been some sort of "allied health" organization in the past, comprising LGBTQ medical school, nursing school, and public health students, but for some reason it did not survive. This is perplexing to me. Was there not enough interest? Committment? If I were to help reorganize a group, will it face the same fate? Anyway, I have received a good amount of feedback from interested students over the past couple of weeks. I had lunch with one respondent who shared many of my observations and concerns about the current social climate at our school. She, as well as most of the others who expressed interest in this organization, was just as shocked as I was that there was no such organization in place already. Thankfully, she seems to be just as eager as I am to establish this group as quickly as possible, so all the bureaucratic folderol doesn't seem as daunting now that I have someone to help. My academic advisor suggested that I extend the invitation to faculty and staff, so today I sent out another email to them. We'll see what happens.
Do I really want to be the queer poster-child of the school? No. My life is not characterized by my queerness, or my Asian-ness, or my femininity, or my ADD tendencies, or my inner wannabe-musicianship, or my 1st-born-child-of-immigrant-parents-ness, or my blog. My being is multi-faceted, and my only hesitation with being the one to start this group is that my social (and academic?) experience at this school will be defined by this endeavor. It takes commitment and
time and devotion. At the end of the day, how much do I really care? I need to ask myself this whenever I cringe at some stupid comment made in class. Do I care enough to have to challenge these comments on a regular basis? Do I care enough to spend my limited free time on such an organization? Am I even the right person to be taking on such a responsibility?
Honestly, I miss the days of old when it wasn't so much damn work to be myself, uninhibitedly. When I didn't have to explain myself to my friends. When giving a shit wasn't so disheartening. When I didn't have to constantly keep a vigilant eye for the sake of self-preservation and sanity. I'm not trying to victimize myself here, because I am certainly no victim. I'm just tired of feeling stifled and not doing anything about it. So I'm doing something.
I hope it's the right thing to do.
Labels: moving through the countdown, queerness, school daze